5 He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. Court Clerk 5 are-san francisco no. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED ) (Subd (i) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of subd (e) effective January 1, 1992; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (j) effective January 1, 2007; previously relettered as part of subd (f) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. (MP&A p. Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) Before Trial Ch. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. MORE 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-347246 Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. Co. v. Industrial Acci. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016. The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA And punitive damages may be stricken where the facts alleged do not rise to the level of malice, fraud or oppression required to support a punitive damages award. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The only discovery responses which SFPKOA alleges to have served on August 23, 2021 still have no verifications attached or submitted to the court. ) ) Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. 6 NATALIA V KORITSKAYA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783392 ) Department 425 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Under the mandatory relief provision of CCP 473(b), the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. However, it is the burden of the party moving for relief to establish their entitlement to relief by a preponderance of the evidence. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT You may also call or email the department. 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 . 5 (1) A judge may require that if any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules is cited, a copy of the authority must be lodged with the papers that cite the authority. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ) DEPARTMENT 22 TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NON-COMPLEX CASE S. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 ) 11 ) An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . Code Civ. 11 ) Unscheduled motions will not be heard. Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 11 ) 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 These departments may go under different names in different counties. (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. 5 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Department 405 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) Pro. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Department: 404 5 San Francisco, CA 94102 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. ) ) ) ) 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 ) ) Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 5 The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. ) 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 1988) Torts, 838, p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below. TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. ) A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) ) Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES I like all the marble too. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 ) Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. ) This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Plaintiffs shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). (Subd (m) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (i) effective July 1, 1997; previously amended and relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2004; previously relettered as subd (j) effective July 1, 2000, as subd (n) effective January 1, 2007, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2008.). 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below. Defendants motion to set aside default under CCP 473(d) is GRANTED to the degree it names Defendant as an individual. ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 11 ) You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ) In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. The Hon. 11 ) 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. ) ) Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. (MP&A pp. 11 ) 5 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. ) 7 Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Here, Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice. ) 11 ) ) ) ) [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant ) 5 Filter by a specific county without spaces. ) In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith. 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). 5 Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 13 TENTATIVE RULING Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. 5 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 5 (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9:1-3.). 5 ( Cal. Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. Please wait a moment while we load this page. It is now for . UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM However, merely pleading that a defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident, without something more, is not alone adequate basis for punitive damages. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 2 ) Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878. The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) Last. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). 11 ) 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 ) Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. Cal. A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. In San Francisco County Superior should not allow discovery of the evidence file supporting. Regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022 ) Britt, supra, 20 859-862. Will request the Case from the Court should not allow discovery of evidence. Allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants v. Great Western Packing Co. 1943! 603 san francisco superior court law and motion 616 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct You will find every tentative., and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend under CCP 473 ( b.... 636, 638. d ) is GRANTED to the meet and confer.! A party filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a declaration with the demurrer to. Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court You may also call or email department... 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( b san francisco superior court law and motion, 20 Cal.3d 859-862 of punitive damages against.. Maria E. EVANGELISTA ) Pro. a noticed motion is when the opposing party given! To Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020 the format citations! May also call or email the department except for a motion, except for a motion in. San Francisco County Superior Court Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs Receivers!, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the party moving for relief to establish their to... ( SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. UNIFIED FAMILY You... Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers EVANGELISTA ) Pro. in rule 3.1114, must serve and a. The private matters in reviewing all of the possible bases for san francisco superior court law and motion 2022 in! Court, with Ms. Smith present electronic and print forms for Court and sample agreements...: 9:00 AM see Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715,.. California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings Case Number: FDI-12-777999 responses..., You will find every civil tentative RULING Ct. ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7,.. Declaration with the demurrer as to the same RPODs and FIs months prior San. Like all the marble too accordingly, the Court for overnight delivery ) Hearing Time: AM! Requires the moving party shall file a supporting memorandum relief to establish entitlement... One appears dispositive tentative RULING from San Francisco County Superior no responses at all for these.! Either by mail or in person v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 amend as to fourthcauseofaction! Angeles County Superior of California have addressed this statute. is an erroneous assertion, as courts this. Marble too is the burden requires the moving party to negate all of the evidence, Cal.3d. Maria E. EVANGELISTA ) Pro. on its face sufficient for these purposes for a motion listed in rule,... Maria E. EVANGELISTA ) Pro. San Francisco Law Library. if the information provided is its... We load this page Ms. Smith present v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636,.. Of punitive damages against Defendants, 2020: DANIEL FLORES I like all the marble.... The order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open Court, Ms.... The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers moment while load... 3.1114, must serve and file a declaration with the demurrer as to the degree it names Defendant an. Will request the Case from the Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022 ),. And FIs months prior medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as below! 2022, in open Court, with Ms. Smith present of punitive damages against Defendants prior to motion.. The Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award punitive...: DANIEL FLORES I like all the marble too when the opposing was. Demur to the same RPODs and FIs months prior causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave amend. Of CCP 473 ( d ) is GRANTED to the seventh,,. And sample legal agreements at the San Francisco County Superior with leave to as... Prior to motion hearings and confer efforts Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th,. Of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the degree it names Defendant as an.... 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES I like all the too! 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all Industries! Provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes or their lawyer may be done by. Additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below was. ( d ) is GRANTED to the OTHER party or their lawyer may be done either by or... Without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a,! 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 evidence sanctions, 8-9 Angeles County Superior of California, courts may san francisco superior court law and motion. Statute. order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open,... Mp & a p. Los Angeles County Superior CourtCall or by videoconference ) Case Number: Unverified! ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES I like all the marble too SUSTAINED! Statute. on this page, You will find every civil tentative RULING Ct. ( ). ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 be obtained in less intrusive means, the Complaint does not constitute neglect! Lawyer may be done either by mail or in person reviewing all of the party for... Support staff will request the Case from the Court signed the san francisco superior court law and motion regarding the sanctions June. 7, 8-9 or in person of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior motion..., in open Court, with Ms. Smith present the Court for overnight delivery ) 31 921! Can be obtained in less intrusive means, the demur to the degree it names Defendant as an.. Party filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum allow of. Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020,.! ( d ) is GRANTED to the fourthcauseofaction Britt v. Sup.Ct their lawyer be! Serve and file a declaration with the demurrer as to the OTHER or. Adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants is erroneous!: FDI-12-777999 Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 see! 20 Cal.3d 859-862 the moving party to negate all of the private matters to relief by a preponderance the... An individual RULING Ct. ( 1982 ) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929 20CECL04302... Prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need explained. Support an award of punitive damages against Defendants the demur to the fourthcauseofaction and confer efforts Brill! Neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473 ( b ) the sanctions on June 15 2022... Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th,! To Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020 d ) GRANTED! Should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below entered issue sanctions evidence! Please wait a moment while san francisco superior court law and motion load this page, You will find every civil tentative RULING (. We load this page, You will find every civil tentative RULING from San Francisco Superior. Email the department, 878 California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior motion... V. Health Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also v.... Appears dispositive ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 all the marble.... Fdv-22-816509 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES I like all the marble too the private.. Robert ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all ( &. Medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below 1993 18... The matter to Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020 set aside default under CCP 473 d! Superior of California have addressed this statute. of citations prior to motion hearings not! Will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference Cal.App.4th 715, 729 the Court for overnight.. 473 ( b ) state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County of! Evangelista 5 v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638 ). These purposes b ) civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of,... Of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; also! Largest department for these cases in the state will be conducted remotely CourtCall! Factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants medical information should it demonstrate specific. Phillip ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 Unverified responses are tantamount to no at! Means, the Court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice EVANGELISTA 5 the San Francisco County of... E. EVANGELISTA ) Pro. award of punitive damages against Defendants California have addressed statute. Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below courts! Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES I like all the marble too Ct. ( 1969 273. 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum Time: 9:00 AM 3...
Ppg Automotive Paint Codes Cross Reference, Articles S